Is Is there any weakness in sports performance in volleyball athletes regarding the correlation between foot posture index and lower limb functional hopping performance?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2023.v17.1678

Keywords:

Athletes; Foot; Exercise test; Posture; Volleyball.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between 1RM calf raise, countermovement jump (CMJ), and functional hop performance with foot posture index (FPI). Methods: Twenty-six volleyball athletes were evaluated in this study. Foot posture index was evaluated with six-item criteria; talar head palpation, curves above and below the malleoli, calcaneus inversion/eversion, talonavicular congruence, medial longitudinal arch high, and forefoot abduction/adduction. Single hop, triple hop, crossover hop for distances, medial side triple hop, 90° medial rotation hop, single-leg vertical jump, 6m. timed hop, 1RM calf raise, and CMJ were measured in this study.
Results: All measurements were tested on both right and left side. Significant differences were found in single hop (p = 0.016), triple hop (p = 0.005), medial side triple hop (p = 0.001), medial rotation hop (p = 0.020) in single leg vertical jump, and FPI for right and left sides (p < 0.001, p < 0.005). There were significant differences when comparing the limb symmetry indexes (LSI%) calculated from hop tests. When the correlations between FPI and hop tests were found significant, correlation and no significant correlations were found between left side and FPI. Conclusion: This study has shown that young female volleyball players may produce low hop performances due to the asymmetric structure relationship FPI scores. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutics Studies; Cases Series.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30

How to Cite

Kahraman, Y. (2023). Is Is there any weakness in sports performance in volleyball athletes regarding the correlation between foot posture index and lower limb functional hopping performance?. Journal of the Foot & Ankle, 17(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2023.v17.1678